This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Saiegh-Haddad, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Epilinguistic and metalinguistic phonological awareness may be subject to different constraints: Evidence from Hebrew

Bar-Ilan University, Israel

The study tested epilinguistic and metalinguistic phonological awareness in junior kindergarten, senior kindergarten and first-grade Hebrew native speaking children (N= 115). The primary aim was to investigate whether children's epilinguistic and metalinguistic phonological awareness was affected by the position of the target phoneme (initial vs. final). Two epilinguistic phonological awareness tasks (initial and final phoneme recognition) and two metalinguistic tasks (initial and final phoneme isolation) were used. The findings showed that, while epilinguistic awareness for initial phonemes was higher than that for final phonemes, the opposite was true for metalinguistic awareness. The results imply that Hebrew native speaking children's metalinguistic awareness is predicated on a language-specific body-coda phonological representation. The phonological organization summoned during epilinguistic awareness tasks appears to be essentially different, however. The disjoint pattern of sensitivity for initial and final phonemes in epilinguistic and metalinguistic phonological awareness tasks suggests that the two levels of awareness are subject to different constraints, and supports their psycholinguistic independence.

Key Words: Body-coda • CV phonology • epilinguistic awareness • Hebrew • metalinguistic awareness

References

• Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
• Aitchison, J. & Straf, M. (1981). Lexical storage and retrieval: A developing skill? Linguistics, 19, 151—195.
• Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R. & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176—181.[CrossRef]
• Bentin, S., Hammer, R. & Cahan, S. (1991). The effects of aging and first grade schooling on the development of phonological awareness. Psychological Science, 2, 271—274.[CrossRef]
• Bentin, S. & Leshem, H. (1993). On the interaction of phonologic awareness and reading acquisition: It's a two-way street. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 125—148.
• Booij, G.E. (1983). Principles and parameters in prosodic phonology. Linguistics, 21, 249—280.
• Booth, J.R. & Perfetti, C.A. (2002). Onset and rime structure influences naming but not early word identification in children and adults. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 1—23.[CrossRef]
• Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 313, 419—421.
• Bryant, P.E., Maclean, M., Bradley, L.L. & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26, 429—438.[CrossRef]
• Byrne, B. & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Evaluating a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 104—111.[CrossRef]
• Carroll, J.M. & Snowling, M.J. (2001). The effects of global similarity between stimuli on children's judgment of rime and alliteration. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 327—342.[CrossRef]
• Cohen-Gross, D. (2003). Syllable structure in Modern Hebrew. In O. Schwarzwald, S. Blum-Kulka & E. Olshtein (Eds), A tribute to Raphael Nir: Studies in communication, linguistics and language teaching (pp. 359—369). Jerusalem: Carmel (In Hebrew).
• De Cara, B. & Goswami, U. (2002). Statistical analysis of similarity relations among spoken words: Evidence for the special status of rimes in English Behavioural Research Methods and Instrumentation, 34, 416—423.
• De Cara, B. & Goswami, U. (2003). Phonological neighbourhood density effects in a rhyme awareness task in 5-year-old children Journal of Child Language, 30, 695—710.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Duncan, L.G., Seymour, P.H.K. & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhymes and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171—208.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Ehri, L.C. & Wilce, L.S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers' conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371—385.
• Feitelson, D. (1988). Facts and fads in beginning reading: A cross-language perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Forster, K. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. Cooper & E. Walker (Eds), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Frith, U., Wimmer, H. & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31—54.[CrossRef]
• Fudge, E.C. (1969). Syllables. Journal of Linguistics, 5, 193—320.
• Fudge, E.C. (1987). Branching structure within the syllable. Journal of Linguistics, 23, 359—377.
• Geudens, A. & Sandra, D. (2003). Beyond implicit phonological knowledge: No support for an onset-rime structure in children's explicit phonological awareness. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 157—182.
• Geudens, A., Sandra, D. & Martensen, H. (2005). Rhyming words and onset-rime constituents: An inquiry into structural breaking points and emergent boundaries in the syllable. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 366—387.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Geudens, A., Sandra, D., Martensen, H. & Nation, K. (2004). No support for an onset-rime structure in English-and Dutch-speaking children's recall errors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Studies of Reading (SSSR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
• Geudens, A., Sandra, D. & van den Broek, W. (2004). Segmenting two-phoneme syllables: Developmental differences in relation with early reading skills. Brain and Language, 90, 338—352.
• Goikoetxea, E. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18, 51—79.[CrossRef]
• Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Gombert, J.E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73—83.[CrossRef]
• Goswami, U. (1988). Orthographic analogies and reading development. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 239—268.
• Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Goswami, U. (1998). Rime-based coding in early reading development in English: Orthographic analogies and rime neighborhoods. In C. Home & R. M. Joshi (Eds), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 69—86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Goswami, U. (2002). Phonology, reading, and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 141—164.
• Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.
• Goswami U. & East, M. (2000). Rhyme and analogy in beginning reading: Conceptual and methodological issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 63—93.[CrossRef]
• Harley, T.A. (2001). The psychology of language: From data to theory (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
• Hulme, C., Hatcher, P.J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J. & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2—28.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Johnston, R.S., Anderson, M. & Holligan, C. (1996). Knowledge of the alphabet and explicit awareness of phonemes: The nature of the relationship. Reading & Writing, 8, 217—234.
• Katz, L. & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67—84). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
• Kirtley, C., Bryant, P.E., Maclean, M. & Bradley, L. (1989). Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 224—245.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Lewcowicz, N. & Low, L. (1979). Effects of visual aids and word structure on phonemic segmentation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 238—252.[CrossRef]
• Liberman, I., Liberman, A.M., Mattingly, I. & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. In R. L. Venezky & J. F. Kavanagh (Eds), Orthography, reading, and dyslexia (pp. 137—153). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
• Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F.W. & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201—212.[CrossRef]
• Luce, P.A. & Pisoni, D.B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model Ear and Hearing, 19, 1—36.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Mann, V.A. (1986). Phonological awareness: The role of reading experience. Cognition, 24, 65—92.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• McBride-Chang, C. (1995). What is phonological awareness? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 179—192.[CrossRef]
• Morais, J., Alegria, J. & Content, A. (1987). The relationship between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 415—438.
• Morais, J., Kolinsky, R., Ventura, P. & Cluytens, M. (1997). Levels of processing in the phonological segmentation of speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 871—875.[CrossRef]
• Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. & Taylor, S. (1997). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 370—396.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• National Reading Panel (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
• Perfetti, C.A., Beck, I., Bell, L.C. & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283—319.
• Perfetti, C.A. & Liu, Y. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems. Reading and Writing, 18, 193—210.[CrossRef]
• Ravid, D. (2004). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In R. M. Joshi and P. G. Aaron (Eds), Handbook of orthography and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Read, C., Zhang, Y.-F., Nie, H.-Y. & Ding, B.-Q. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing the alphabetic spelling. Cognition, 24, 31—44.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 115—135.
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudo words in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495—512.
• Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children's ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 607—625.
• Savage, R., Blair, R. & Rvachew, S. (2006). Rimes are not necessarily favored by prereaders: Evidence from meta- and epilinguistic phonological tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 183—205.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Schreuder, R. & van Bon, W.H.J. (1989). Phonemic analysis: Effects of word properties Journal of Research in Reading, 12, 59—78.[CrossRef]
• Seymour, P.H.K., Duncan, L.G. & Bolik, F.M. (1999). Rhymes and phonemes in the common unit task: Replications and implications for beginning reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 113—130.[CrossRef]
• Share, D. [L.] & Blum, P. (2005). Syllable splitting in literate and preliterate Hebrew speakers: Onsets and rimes or bodies and codas? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 182—202.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Share, D.L. & Levin, I. (1995). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In M. Harris and G. Hatano (Eds), Learning to read and write (pp. 89—111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Shimron, J. (1993). The role of vowels in reading: A review of studies of English and Hebrew. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 52—67.[CrossRef]
• Shimron, J. (1999). The role of vowel signs in Hebrew: Beyond word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 301—319.[CrossRef]
• Stahl, S.A. & Murray, B.A. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 221—234.[CrossRef]
• Stahl, S.A. & Murray, B.A. (1998). Issues involved in defining phonological awareness and its relation to early reading. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 65—89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Stanback, M.L. (1992). Syllable and rime patterns for teaching reading: Analysis of a frequency-based vocabulary of 17,602 words. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 196—221.[CrossRef]
• Stanovich, K.E. Cunningham, A.E. & Cramer, B.B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175—190.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Stuart, M. (2005). Phonemic analysis and reading development: Some current issues. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 39—49.[CrossRef]
• Treiman, R. (1983). The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games. Cognition, 15, 49—74.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161—181.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Treiman, R. (1988). The internal structure of the syllable. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds), Linguistic Structure in Language Processing (pp. 27—52). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
• Treiman, R., Mullenix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R. & Richmond-Welty, E.D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107—136.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Uhry, J.K. & Ehri, L.C. (1999). Ease of segmenting two-and three-phoneme words in kindergarten: Rime cohesion or vowel salience? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 564—603.[CrossRef]
• Vihman, M.M. (1996). Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Wagner, R.K. & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192—212.[CrossRef]
• Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1—33.
• Wimmer, H. & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91—103.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Yopp, H.K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159—177.[CrossRef]
• Ziegler, J.C. & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3—29.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

First Language, Vol. 27, No. 4, 385-405 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0142723707081730


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Saiegh-Haddad, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?