Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First Language
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savinainen-Makkonen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Geminate template: A model for first Finnish words

Tuula Savinainen-Makkonen

University of Helsinki

The CV syllable or reduplicative word is seen as an essential structure in early speech development, and word-initial consonants are seen to be a part of the optimal syllable in the speech of young children. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of the CV(CV) structure for a description of the first words of Joel (1;1—1;6), who is acquiring Finnish. Among his first 50 words, many words were produced with a (C)VC:V structure instead of a CVCV structure. An overused geminate template gives support for the saliency of the medial position. The saliency of the medial position is supported by the fact that word-initial consonant omission is common in the speech of Finnish children despite the word stress being on the first syllable. Additional support comes from the reduction of Finnish three-syllable words. Even though a reduced word usually consists of the first two syllables (SW1), a geminate structure may become part of the word regardless of its location in the word.

Key Words: Acquisition of Finnish • phonological acquisition • templates

References

  • Allen, G.D. & Hawkins, S. (1978). The development of phonological rhythm. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds), Syllables and segments (pp. 173—185). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
  • Allen, G.D. & Hawkins, S. (1980). Phonological rhythm: Definition and development. In G. Yeni-Komshian, J. Kavanagh & C. Ferguson (Eds), Child phonology, 1: Production (pp. 227—256). New York: Academic Press.
  • Aoyama, K. (2000). A psycholinguistic perspective on Finnish and Japanese prosody: Perception, production and child acquisition of consonantal quantity distinctions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii.
  • Bernhardt, B. & Stemberger, J.P. (1998). Handbook of phonological development. From the perspective of constraint-based nonlinear phonology. San Diego and elsewhere: Academic Press.
  • Chin, S. & Dinnsen, D. (1992). Consonant clusters in disordered speech: Constraints and correspondence patterns. Journal of Child Language, 19, 259—285.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Demuth, K. & Fee, J. (1995). Minimal words in early phonological development. Unpublished manuscript, Brown University and Dalhousie University.
  • Dinnsen, D.A. (1996). Context effects in the acquisition of fricatives. In B. Bernhardt, J. Gilbert & D. Ingram (Eds), Proceedings of the UBC international conference on phonological acquisition (pp. 136—148). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Echols, C., Crowhurst, M.J. & Childers, J.B. (1997). The perception of rhythmic units in speech by children and adults. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 202—225.[CrossRef]
  • Edwards, M.L. (1979). Word-position in fricative acquisition. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development (Stanford University ), 16, 67—76.
  • Edwards, M.L. (1996). Word position effects in the production of fricatives. In B. Bernhardt, J. Gilbert & D. Ingram (eds), Proceedings of the UBC international conference on phonological acquisition (pp. 149—158). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Fenson, L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, J.S., Bates, E., Thal, D. & Pethick, S.J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (5,SerialNo.242).
  • Ferguson, C.A. & Farwell, C.B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51, 419—439.[CrossRef]
  • Fikkert, P. (1994). On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Dordrecht: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
  • Gerken, L. (1994). A metrical template account of children's weak syllables omissions from multi-syllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565—584.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Grunwell, P. (1985). Phonological assessment of child speech. Windsor: NFER Nelson.
  • Grunwell, P. (1987). Clinical phonology (2nd ed.). London and elsewhere: Chapman & Hall.
  • Howell, J. & Dean, E. (1994). Treating phonological disorders in children: Metaphon — theory to practice (2nd ed.). London: Whurr Publishers.
  • Ingram, D. (1989). Phonological disability in children (2nd ed.). London: Whurr Publishers.
  • Ingram, D. (1999). Phonological acquisition. In M. Barrett (Ed.), The Development of Language (pp. 73—97). Hove, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.
  • Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals translated by A. Keiler. The Hague, Paris: Mouton; originally published in 1941.
  • Johnson, J.S., Lewis, L.B. & Hogan, J.C. (1997). A production limitation in syllables number: A longitudinal study of one child's early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 24, 327—349.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jusczyk, P., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N.J. (1993). Infant's preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675—687.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Karlsson, F. (1983). Suomen kielen äänne- ja muotorakenne [Finnish phonology and morphology]. Porvoo, Helsinki, Juva: WSOY.
  • Kehoe, M. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1997). Truncation patterns in English-speaking children's word production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 526—541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kunnari, S. (1997). Fonologisen kehityksen varhaisvaiheet [Early phonological development] Suomen logopedis-foniatrinen aikakauslehti, 17, 33—38.
  • Kunnari, S. (2000). Characteristics of early lexical and phonological development in children acquiring Finnish (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu; Acta Universitatis Ouluensis). Oulu: Oulu University Press.
  • Kunnari, S. (2002). Word length in syllables: Evidence from early word production on Finnish. First Language, 22, 119—135.
  • Kunnari, S., Nakai, S. & Vihman, M.M. (2001). Cross-linguistic evidence for acquisition of geminates. Psychology of Language and Communication, 5, 13—24.
  • Kunnari, S. & Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (1999). Production of three-syllable words. Poster presented at the VIIIth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, San Sebastian.
  • Lyytinen, P. (1999). Varhaisen kommunikaation ja kielen kehityksen arviointimenetelmä [Finnish manual for communicative development inventories]. Jyväskylä: Niilo Mäki Instituutti.
  • Macken, M. (1993). Developmental changes in the acquisition of phonology. In B. de Boysson-Bardies et al. (Eds), Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life (pp. 435—450). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Menn, L. (1971). Phonotactic rules in beginning speech. Lingua, 26, 225—251.[CrossRef]
  • Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic, and phonological capabilities. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, 2 (pp. 3—50). London: Academic Press.
  • Nettelbladt, U. (1983). Developmental studies of dysphonology in children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund; Travaux de l'institut de linguistique de Lund) Lund: CWK Gleerup.
  • Richardson, U. (1998). Familial dyslexia and sound duration in the quantity distinctions of Finnish infants and adults (Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä) Jyväskylä: Studia Philologica Jyväskyläensia.
  • Saaristo-Helin, K., Savinainen-Makkonen, T. & Kunnari, S. (2006). The phonological mean length of utterances: Methodological challenges from a crosslinguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33, 179—190.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2000a). Word-initial consonant omissions — a developmental process in children learning Finnish. First Language, 20, 161—185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2000b). Learning long words — a typological perspective. Language and Speech, 42 (2), 205—225.
  • Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2000c). Learning to produce three-syllable words: A longitudinal study of Finnish twins. In M. Perkins & S. Howard (Eds), New directions in language development and disorders (pp. 223—231). New York and elsewhere: Plenum Publishing.
  • Savinainen-Makkonen, T. (2001). Suomalainen lapsi fonologiaa omaksumassa [Finnish children acquiring phonology] Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki (Publications of the Department of Phonetics, 42).
  • Savinainen-Makkonen, T. & Kunnari, S. (2004). Systemaattisen kauden rajoitukset ja fonologiset prosessit [Constraints and phonological processes after the first words stage]. In S. Kunnari & T. Savinainen-Makkonen (Eds), Mistä on pienten sanat tehty? [From what are children's words made up?] (pp. 99—109). Helsinki: WSOY.
  • Stampe, D. (1969). The acquisition of phonetic representation. Proceedings of the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 27, 433—444.
  • Stampe, D. (1979). A dissertation on natural phonology. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.
  • Stoel-Gammon, C. (1985). Phonetic inventories, 15—24 months: A longitudinal study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 302—315.
  • Stoel-Gammon, C. (1996). Phonological assessment using a hierarchical framework. In K. N. Cole, P. S. Dale & D. J. Thal (Eds), Assessment of communication and language (pp. 77—96). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
  • Stoel-Gammon, C. (2002). Intervocalic consonants in the speech of typically developing children: Emergence and early use. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 16, 155—168.[CrossRef]
  • Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J.A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247—271.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Toivainen, J. (1997). The acquisition of Finnish. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 87—182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Toivainen, K. (1994). Hoivakielen tutkimuksesta ja suomen murteiden hoivasanastosta [On research of babytalk register and on babytalk words in the dialects of Finnish]. In K. Toivainen & J. Toivainen (Eds), Ensikielenä suomalaiskieli [Finno-Ugric language as a first language] (Publications of the Department of Finnish and General Linguistics of the University of Turku, 42), 42—9.
  • Tuomi, T. (1980). Reverse dictionary of modern standard Finnish (2nd ed.). Hämeenlinna: SKS.
  • Turunen, P. (2003). Production of word structure. A constraint-based study of 2;6 year old Finnish children at-risk for dyslexia and their controls (Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä; Jyväskylä Studies in Languages 52).
  • Vainio, M. (1996). Phoneme frequencies in Finnish text and speech. In A. Iivonen & A. Klippi (Eds), Studies in logopedics and phonetics 5 (Publications of the Department of Phonetics, University of Helsinki, Series B: Phonetics, Logopedics and Speech Communication, 6), 181—94.
  • Vihman, M.M. (1991). Ontogeny of phonetic gestures: Speech production. In I. G. Mattingly & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds), Universals in human language (pp. 69—90). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Vihman, M.M., Ferguson, C.A. & Elbert, M. (1986). Phonological development from babbling to speech: Common tendencies and individual differences Applied Pyscholinguistics, 7, 3—40.
  • Vihman, M.M. & Miller, R. (1988). Words and babble at the threshold of language acquisition. In M. D. Smith & J. L. Locke (Eds), The emergent lexicon: The child's development of linguistic vocabulary (pp. 151—183). New York: Academic Press.
  • Vihman, M.M. & Velleman, S.L. (2000). The construction of a first phonology Phonetica, 57, 255—266.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wijnen, F., Krikhaar, E. & Den Os, E. (1994). The (non)realization of unstressed elements in children's utterances: Evidence for a rhythmic constraint Journal of Child Language, 21, 59—83.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

First Language, Vol. 27, No. 4, 347-359 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0142723707081728


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savinainen-Makkonen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?