Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First Language
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Locke, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Babbling and early speech: continuity and individual differences

John L. Locke

Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical Schoc

One of the recognized precursors to speaking is babbling. The related- ness of these activities is suggested, in the typical case, by the develop mentally continuous manner in which babbling flows into and coexists with speaking, the shared morphology of babble and speech, and the socially similar ways that children display (and presumably use) babbling and speaking. Nevertheless, the developmental significance of babbling is unknown. In this paper, I sample findings on normally developing children as well as special populations, including hearing- impaired, retarded, and tracheostomized children, and experimental work on song birds. Attention is given to the question of whether individual differences in babbling are carried over into speaking. I also ask whether it is or should be possible to anticipate deviant or delayed speech from analyses of prelinguistic vocalization and, if so, what that would tell us about the theoretical significance of babbling.

First Language, Vol. 9, No. 6, 191-205 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/014272378900900606


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
First LanguageHome page
V. L. Lewedag, D. K. Oller, and M. P. Lynch
Infants' vocalization patterns across home and laboratory environments
First Language, January 1, 1994; 14(40): 049 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
V. L. Lewedag, D. K. Oller, and M. P. Lynch
Infants' vocalization patterns across home and laboratory environments
First Language, January 1, 1994; 14(42-43): 049 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
M. Legerstee
Changes in the quality of infant sounds as a function of social and nonsocial stimulation
First Language, January 1, 1991; 11(33): 327 - 343.
[Abstract] [PDF]