This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Iozzi, L. Articles by Barbieri, M. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Preschoolers' use of analogies in referential communication

University of Trieste

Maria Silvia Barbieri

University of Trieste, barbieri{at}units.it

In referential communication tasks, preschoolers' messages often fail. Children appear to produce `nonconventional' messages involving `idiosyncratic' or `private' meanings. The aim of this study was to examine whether some nonconventional messages are analogies that function to permit children to communicate in the absence of possessing a conventional name for an intended referent. In Experiment 1, 4- and 5-year-olds were presented a classical referential communication task consisting of `easy-' and `difficult-to-name' sets of items. As predicted, children at both ages produced conventional messages to refer to `easy' stimuli and analogies to refer to the `difficult' stimuli. A second experiment ruled out the possibility that the use of analogies was in fact due to an erroneous categorization of the target stimulus. Together, the results demonstrate that analogical renaming does not stem from an erroneous categorization of the referent but instead may serve as a purposeful communicative strategy.

Key Words: Analogy • conversational development • preschoolers • referential communication • simile

First Language, Vol. 29, No. 2, 192-207 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0142723708099453


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?