This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hudson Kam, C. L. Articles by Edwards, N. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The use of uh and um by 3- and 4-year-old native English-speaking children: Not quite right but not completely wrong

University of California, Berkeley, clhudson{at}berkeley.edu

Nicole A. Edwards

Boston University

The delay markers (DMs) uh and um are often used by adult English speakers to indicate that an upcoming pause is due to a speech disruption, not the end of a conversational turn. Moreover, uh and um indicate different degrees of disruption (Clark & Fox Tree, 2002). Thus, it appears that children must learn how to use DMs appropriately. In the current study we examined DM use in elicited speech samples from 24 3- and 4-year-old children. We found that pauses following DMs were longer than those not following a DM, but that there was no difference between the pauses following uh and um. Children at this age, then, appear to understand the basic use of DMs, but do not yet differentiate between them.

Key Words: Conversational development • disfluencies • filled pauses • narrative • turn-taking

First Language, Vol. 28, No. 3, 313-327 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0142723708091149


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?