This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Pedlow, R. Articles by Wales, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Children’s production and comprehension of politeness in requests: Relationships to behavioural adjustment, temperament and empathy

Telstra Research Laboratories, Australia, Robert.Pedlow{at}team.telstra.com

Ann Sanson

Australian Institute of Family Studies

Roger Wales

Latrobe University

This study investigated the relationships of children’s behavioural adjustment, temperamental approach tendencies and empathy to their ability to produce and comprehend one aspect of politeness (namely level of directness) in requests, in a sample of 100 ten-and-a-half-year-old children from the Australian Temperament Project (ATP) population. The study showed that high levels of anxious fearful behaviour problems increased the likelihood of producing less direct requests to more powerful others while high levels of approaching temperament increased the likelihood of producing less direct requests to more distant others. High levels of hostile aggressive behaviour problems increased the likelihood of producing direct requests to more distant others. By comparison high levels of approaching temperament, empathy and social anxiety increased the likelihood of children judging more direct requests to more powerful others to be effective. The findings supported the view that individual differences are related to children’s use of directness in response to variation in the social context of request situations.

Key Words: Children’s adjustment • children’s requests • everyday politeness • individual differences • linguistic politeness • pragmatic development

First Language, Vol. 24, No. 3, 347-367 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0142723704046188


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?