Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First Language
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ring, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fenson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The correspondence between parent report and child performance for receptive and expressive vocabulary beyond infancy

Erin Dyer Ring

San Diego State University

Larry Fenson

San Diego State University

Parent judgement of their toddler's receptive and expressive vocabulary skills was compared with children's laboratory performance on comprehension and production language tasks. Parents reviewed two separate sets of pictures. For one set they were asked whether their child would recognize the named member of each of 35 pairs of pictured items. For the other set, they were asked whether their child would be able to verbalize each of the pictured objects or actions. After the parent completed each task, the child was tested on the same items. Parents also completed the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory (CDI), which includes a broader index of expressive vocabulary. The results indicated significant correspondence between parent report and child judgement for comprehension (r = 0.55) and for production (r = 0.67). The CDI expressive vocabulary scale score also correlated with child performance on the expressive vocabulary task (r = 0.78).

First Language, Vol. 20, No. 59, 141-159 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/014272370002005902


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
First LanguageHome page
S. Stolt, L. Haataja, H. Lapinleimu, and L. Lehtonen
Early lexical development of Finnish children: A longitudinal study
First Language, August 1, 2008; 28(3): 259 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
B. M. Bernhardt, N. Kemp, and J. F. Werker
Early word-object associations and later language development
First Language, October 1, 2007; 27(4): 315 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
S. Wehberg, W. Vach, D. Bleses, P. Thomsen, T. O. Madsen, and H. Basboll
Danish children's first words: Analysing longitudinal data based on monthly CDI parental reports
First Language, October 1, 2007; 27(4): 361 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]