Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First Language
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Speidel, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phonological short-term memory and individual differences in learning to speak: a bilingual case study

Gisela E. Speidel

Kamehameha Schools, Honolulu

The language development of two bilingual siblings, who learned to speak at greatly different rates, is briefly described. The child with the delayed onset of speech had difficulty with articulation, syntax, function words and inflections, particularly when speaking in German. Now, as a young teenager, he has no overt speech problem in English, his preferred language, and he does well in school and on standardized achievement tests of language arts and mathematics. Nevertheless, on a storytelling task at age 12;6, he used significantly shorter, less complex sentences than his sister did at the same age. In German, his 'mother tongue' yet less preferred language, he still has major grammatical difficulties. Recent memory tests showed that his early difficulty with immediate verbal repetition is still present. His difficulty is most pronounced on a verbal short-term memory task requiring repetition of unrelated words, whereas on a task where the verbal input can be reproduced nonverbally, his short-term memory is excellent.

First Language, Vol. 13, No. 37, 69-91 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/014272379301303705


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically DiverHome page
D. Rhein
A Clinical Hypothesis for Intermittent Unintelligibility in Two English Language Learners
Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations, October 1, 2008; 15(3): 82 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Language Teaching ResearchHome page
R. Erlam
Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition
Language Teaching Research, April 1, 2005; 9(2): 147 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
First LanguageHome page
C. C. Kushnir and J. Blake
The nature of the cognitive deficit in specific language impairment
First Language, February 1, 1996; 16(46): 21 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
B. McLaughlin
Aptitude from an information-processing perspective
Language Testing, November 1, 1995; 12(3): 370 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]